Subscribe

FSI’s top advocacy priorities in 2020

Capitol Hill FSI lobbying priorities

The tax treatment of financial services and reducing burdens on advisers' business entities are among the items FSI will be focusing on this year

Representing our members’ interests as effectively as possible on regulatory and legislative matters requires us not only to be deeply involved in issues that are top of mind today, like the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Reg BI, but to anticipate where the next potential challenges for independent advisers and firms may emerge.

With this in mind, we continually identify the issues most likely to impact our members’ businesses both today and six to 12 months from now, in order to develop effective engagement strategies.

In 2020, our key advocacy priorities will be:

Issues of concern to independent financial services firms and advisers

Tax treatment of financial services and businesses. Independent advisers continue to face challenges to their independent contractor status. Reclassifying advisers would have profound tax implications that would undermine our industry’s economic model. We will continue to educate lawmakers on the unintended consequences of such efforts. In addition, we will continue to oppose proposals to tax financial services and transactions or impose professional privilege taxes on advisers.

Reducing burdens on business entities operated by advisers. The industry has evolved, and it is time for the SEC to allow payment of securities income directly from firms to business entities operated by advisers. We will continue to seek relief on this issue, as well as push to ease the burden of audits by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board on small firms and allow association health plans.

Issues of concern to the financial services industry

Standard of care. We are committed to working with our industry and regulators to ensure that Reg BI successfully establishes an effective standard of care that improves investor protection and supports access to financial advice and services.

At the same time, we will continue to vigorously oppose efforts by states to create their own fiduciary standards or disclosure requirements to prevent a confusing patchwork of potentially conflicting regulations.

Regulation by enforcement. We will continue to fight back against enforcement actions that are predicated solely on staff guidance or that create new requirements without a transparent rule-making process that includes notice and comment. Accordingly, we remain committed to raising concerns about the SEC’s share class disclosure initiative, monitoring FINRA’s new examination program, and pressing for a “grace period” for Reg BI implementation.

Federal cybersecurity requirements. We support legislative efforts to create a national data breach notification requirement that preempts states’ own patchwork of unique approaches. We will also advocate for uniform, scalable requirements that will not unduly burden small firms.

Issues of concern to clients

Retirement security solutions provided by the private sector. We support the adoption of multiple-employer plans under Reg BI. Our efforts include supporting state MEPs and voluntary state-run retirement plans as alternatives to mandatory state-run retirement plans. We are also working to bolster Main Street Americans’ ability to save for retirement by advocating to restore the deductibility of advisory fees.

Prevention of financial exploitation of vulnerable adults. We will continue to encourage states to establish legislation to protect senior investors, patterned on NASAA’s model rule.

Bolstered by the support and engagement of our members, we look forward to a productive year working toward achieving these priorities.

Dale Brown is president and CEO of the Financial Services Institute.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Reining in regulation by enforcement

The Financial Services Institute is asking the SEC to adopt a procedural framework to detect and prevent certain unfair enforcement practices.

ESG rules shouldn’t make it harder for advisors to do business

Politicians and regulators shouldn't be unduly favoring or burdening particular investment vehicles.

The problem with the SEC’s deluge of rule proposals

The pace and breadth of the agency's current rulemaking is not allowing for constructive criticism from the people implementing the rules.

Restricting advisers’ independent contractor status is a no-win for everyone

It's critical that the DOL and members of Congress hear from advisers what their independent classification means, not just to them but to their clients as well.

Pushing to bolster retirement readiness with SECURE 2.0

The legislation is a necessary step to ensure that more and more Americans can live comfortably once they stop working.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print