Subscribe

Finra proposes marking up its markup guideline

Finra is proposing to drop its 5% markup-markdown guideline, which can be traced back to the 1940s.

Finra is proposing to drop its 5% markup-markdown guideline, which can be traced back to the 1940s.

In a notice for comment published last week, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. proposed rule changes that would eliminate the 5% policy.

The policy established a general guideline for brokers, the thrust of which was that charging customers more than 5% on a trade could be deemed excessive.

The policy was “based on the execution practices and market efficiencies of nearly 70 years ago” and therefore is outdated, Finra said in its notice.

The regulator noted that brokerage firms have interpreted the guideline to mean that a markup, markdown or commission exceeding 5% is prohibited. Conversely, anything under 5% is allowable.

But the policy was never a rule — just a rule of thumb.

The regulator won’t be setting a new, lower percentage as a guideline, however, “as this may encourage members to artificially peg (or cap) their markups, markdowns and commissions based upon the new percentage,” Finra noted.

The new rule would incorporate existing factors firms are supposed to use in determining fair trading costs, including a security’s liquidity, price and size of the transaction.

“I’ve seen [Finra] attack a 3%” markup, said Robert Beers, an industry attorney and compliance consultant.

He would like to see more guidance from Finra regarding transaction costs. Determining what is excessive “can come down to a gut feeling” by Finra as to what is proper, Mr. Beers said.

The notice “may be an opportunity for commentators to force them to be more precise,” he said.

Finra also wants to require firms to provide an equity commission schedule to retail customers.

Giving customers the ability to compare commission rates may result in more competition and lower transaction costs, Finra said.

The proposal is part of Finra’s continuing consolidation of legacy NASD and New York Stock Exchange rules. Finra wants to transfer NASD Rule 2440, NASD Interpretive Memo 2440-1 and NYSE Rule 375 into a new Finra Rule 2121.

The deadline for comments on the rejiggering of the 5% proposal is March 28.

E-mail Dan Jamieson at [email protected].

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Five-time MLB all-star sues UBS, ex-rep for $7.6M

Five-time MLB all-star Mike Sweeney claims unsuitable investments in private placements cost him nearly $5M. Now he's suing UBS and one of its former reps to recover the cash.

Wells Fargo to add 1,400 reps this year, report says

Wells Fargo Advisors LLC chief executive Danny Ludeman told Dow Jones today that he expects to hire more than 1,400 brokers this year.

15 transformational events: ‘Merrill Lynch rule’ spurs long debate

When the SEC proposed the broker-dealer exemption rule in 1999, few realized that it would result in a lawsuit against the commission and provoke a long and contentious debate about fiduciary duty.

Abby Johnson, Ronald O’Hanley to share role at Fidelity

It came as no surprise that the mutal fund giant split Roger Lawson's old job in two. It was no shocker that it tapped Abby Johnson to handle some of Lawson's former duties. But the hiring of BNY Mellon's Ronald O'Hanley? That was a surprise

Abby Johnson to lead new unit — including Fido’s RIA custody biz

Fidelity late today announced that Abigail Johnson will head up a newly created unit that includes Fidelity's RIA custody business.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print