Subscribe

DOL, industry spar over fund lineups

The Labor Department and representatives from service providers and pension advocacy groups sparred last week about whether presenting a retirement plan with a fund lineup constitutes investment advice

The Labor Department and representatives from service providers and pension advocacy groups sparred last week about whether presenting a retirement plan with a fund lineup constitutes investment advice.

“The plan sponsor looks to us to look across the platform and finds funds that have met the criteria they identified,” said Karen Prange, executive director and assistant general counsel for JPMorgan Chase & Co. “Showing what’s available on a platform shouldn’t fall under the “fiduciary’ definition.”

Ms. Prange was among the retirement industry representatives present at the Labor Department’s two-day hearing in Washington to discuss the agency’s proposed rule to expand the definition of “fiduciary.” The DOL is proposing that it drop its five-part test, which it said allows service providers and brokers to give advice while skirting the law, and replace it with a rule that would make anyone providing advice for a fee a fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

Service providers and record keepers have been wary of the proposed regulation out of fear that everyday tasks, such as presenting a set of funds to a plan sponsor, might be considered a fiduciary act.

Ms. Prange, representing record keeper J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, said that disclosures and disclaimers proclaiming that a service provider merely is making funds available, and not trying to provide impartial investment advice, should help clarify to plan sponsors the role that service providers play.

“The current disclosures coming from plan providers, along with disclosures and disclaimers about the roles of the relationships, will further enhance each other and put plan sponsors in a stronger position,” she said.

But Norman Stein, a senior policy adviser at the Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel University and consultant for the Pension Rights Center, questions whether plan fiduciaries and participants could really grasp those disclosures.

“There’s a difference between a plan fiduciary for General Electric [Co.] and someone who runs a doctor’s office,” he said.

Indeed, a study released by the Government Accountability Office last week revealed that many sponsors, especially those for smaller plans, don’t understand whether service providers are acting as fiduciaries, and aren’t aware that the provider’s compensation might vary based on the funds the plan uses.

The same seems to be true for participants, the GAO found, as they may not understand that providers aren’t fiduciaries, and tend to perceive investment education as advice. They may also turn to their plan’s service provider for individual retirement account rollovers as they exit, but may not understand that fees are higher for investments outside of the plan.

E-mail Darla Mercado at [email protected].

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Stuck in the middle

Newly elected Finra board member whose firm is connected to a bribery scandal says the matter should have no effect on his ability to serve.

Fighting for market share in the LTC business

A handful of publicly held life insurers dominate the market for traditional long-term-care insurance, but mutual life insurers are beginning to make inroads with agents and financial advisers.

Breaking up is hard to do – especially with annuities

When a client came to his office bearing her new divorce decree, adviser Dale Russell became the bearer…

Longevity insurance promising – but higher rates would help

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service like it, as do many estate-planning experts. Now all that…

Long-term care: Cutting back coverage

When a 74-year-old client visited Ellen R. Siegel six years ago with news of an upcoming 12% rate increase on the premium of her long-term-care insurance, the adviser knew she had to navigate the potential benefit cuts with the precision of a surgeon.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print