Subscribe

Bill would require SEC to restrict mandatory arbitration

The Securities and Exchange Commission would be required to issue rules prohibiting or limiting mandatory-arbitration clauses in securities contracts under draft legislation introduced last week by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.

The Securities and Exchange Commission would be required to issue rules prohibiting or limiting mandatory-arbitration clauses in securities contracts under draft legislation introduced last week by Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.

This Senate provision goes further than the proposed Investor Protection Act, approved Oct. 28 by the House Financial Services Committee, which is worded in a way that would give the SEC the authority to adopt such rules but not mandate it.

The Consumer Federation of America applauded the provision in the Dodd draft, saying it “strengthens provisions regarding mandatory pre-dispute binding-arbitration clauses in broker and adviser contracts.”

A large portion of the brokerage industry has opposed eliminating mandatory arbitration clauses, with trade groups arguing that the arbitration system is more efficient than the courts in resolving securities disputes.

“The current arbitration system provides equal protection to all investors in a manner that is fair, and both faster and less expensive than court-based litigation,” Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association spokesman Andrew DeSouza wrote in an e-mail.

The provision in the Dodd bill “mandates restrictions by the SEC before the commission even has an adequate opportunity to review the performance of the current system or the impact of any changes on small investors,” he wrote.

SIFMA has called for studying the issue before any action is taken.

State securities regulators have called for eliminating the clauses and have said that investors should be able to choose whether to use the arbitration system, which is operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

Like the Investor Protection Act, the Dodd draft would raise the asset threshold for SEC registration of investment advisory firms to $100 million, from $25 million. Advisory firms with less than $100 million would be regulated by the states.

That would move about 4,200 advisory firms from SEC oversight to the states. Currently, the SEC oversees 11,300 firms, and the states regulate 14,500 firms.

E-mail Sara Hansard at [email protected].

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Incoming NAPFA head looks to keep advisers from growing up, out of group

Incoming NAPFA chairman William Baldwin is looking to find ways to keep firms involved in the 2,150-member organization once they get larger.

State regulator says SEC dropped the ball on private placements

Don't blame state regulators for the financial crisis; blame those who took power away from state regulators.

Should annuities be mandatory for 401(k)s? Fund companies go on the offensive

Participants in 401(k) plans do not want the government to require them to convert a portion of their 401(k) assets to annuities, according to the results of a survey of about 3,000 households released today by the Investment Company Institute.

Labor chief wants to add annuities to 401(k) mix

Encouraging employers to offer annuities in pension plans will be one of the Labor Department's top regulatory goals in 2010.

Schapiro: SEC will act on 12(b)-1 fees this year

The Securities and Exchange Commission will reassess the 12(b)-1 fees collected by brokers as compensation for selling and servicing mutual funds, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said today.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print