Subscribe

Cross-selling is a dud so far for advisers, banks, survey finds

After suffering major revenue shortfalls from their mortgage and credit card operations, big U.S. banks are looking to their wealth management businesses to help pick up the slack

After suffering major revenue shortfalls from their mortgage and credit card operations, big U.S. banks are looking to their wealth management businesses to help pick up the slack.

But to date, they aren’t getting as much traction as they expected from efforts to cross-sell investment products to their bank customers.

One-third of 75 bank financial advisers surveyed online by Aite Group LLC during the first quarter said that they generated no revenue from internal referrals. Another third said that internal referrals generated some revenue but less than 25% of their previous 12-month total.

Only a third of the respondents said that internal referrals generated more than a quarter of their revenue, but many of those got much of their business from mass-market retail-bank customers, who tend to be more time-consuming and less profitable.

COMPENSATION PLAN

Part of the problem could be the way that banks reward financial advisers and whether they promote a commission or fee-based business model, according to Aite’s report.

“Banks need to put together a compensation plan that rewards bank advisers and promotes the achievements of advisers who leverage internal partners and have a diversified business model,” said senior analyst Sophie Schmitt, who conducted the study.

“Banks need to find these successful advisers and study them,” she said. “Maybe they can expand this group.”

Advisers who did substantial business through internal bank referrals split into two groups: those who mainly pursued mass-market accounts of less than $250,000, and those who went after business from bank brokerage phone centers, small-business owners, and private- and commercial-bank customers. Those advisers tended to have larger, more profitable accounts.

But overall, sales and revenue generated by internal referrals were more likely to be of commission-based products such as annuities and 401(k) plans, and one-time consulting fees.

Brokerage leaders have been “showcasing financial advisers that have shifted their business from commission-based to fee-based,” even though those advisers don’t necessarily use internal referrals to generate business or cross-sell banking products, Ms. Schmitt said.

She suggested that banks develop a preferred business model and develop incentives for advisers who follow it.

“Advisers may change if they see another adviser who is more successful who is working with partners,” Ms. Schmitt said.

Howard Diamond, managing director and chief operating officer of recruiting firm Diamond Consultants, said that he isn’t surprised about the survey’s results.

He thinks that several factors are behind the low rate of internal referral business.

“Competition, compensation and cultural differences are all involved,” Mr. Diamond said.

“For a long time, the idea of getting referrals from a bank enticed advisers to go to a bank platform,” he said.

But once they get there, they run into some problems fulfilling the promise of plentiful internal referrals, Mr. Diamond said.

COMPETING FOR BUSINESS

Many branch-based advisers find that they are competing against other advisers, sometimes in the same branch, he said.

Further, bank employees aren’t given much incentive to pass referrals along.

“Say a customer service representative makes a referral. Maybe they get $25,” Mr. Diamond said.

“The banker doesn’t want to lose control of his client’s assets,” especially for such a small reward, he said.

“Every financial institution wants 100% wallet share of their clients, but they don’t care how they do it or who gets that wallet share,” Mr. Diamond said.

In the case of small-business and private- or commercial-banking customers, they may need banking services such as lines of credit, which strengthens their ties to their banker, and they may end up using private-bank wealth management services or an outside firm.

The cultural disconnect between traditional wirehouse representatives and their bank ownership causes many to feel little reason to center their business around bank customers, Mr. Diamond said.

Last week’s firing of Sallie Krawcheck from her job running Bank of America Corp.’s Merrill Lynch unit is a case in point, he said.

“Our phones are ringing off the hook,” with representatives calling the recruiter, Mr. Diamond said.

“It isn’t so much that they loved Sallie necessarily, but to the Merrill Lynch advisers it is more about the bank taking over a world-class wealth management firm,” he said.

Email Lavonne Kuykendall [email protected]

Related Topics: , , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Windfall’s pitfalls

After pocketing a $1 million Make Me Rich jackpot last fall, Detroit-area lottery winner Amanda Clayton is getting a trial-by-fire lesson in the challenges of having wealth.

NAPFA’s next chairman will fight Finra oversight

Rhoades named to succeed John; wants to keep fiduciary standard for investment advisers.

Advisers now more trusted than doctors or accountants, survey shows

Guiding clients through tempestuous times has apparently strengthened bonds; 'to hell and back'

Succession planning still an advisory hurdle

Allan Eyre never made a succession plan.

National Lampoon goes to jail? SEC, Justice Dept. file charges

Government alleges that company's top two execs perpetrated $230M investment fraud at Fair Finance Co.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print