Subscribe

IAA backs Obama on banning mandatory securities arbitration

The Investment Adviser Association supports the Obama's administration's efforts to ban mandatory arbitration clauses in securities contracts.

The Investment Adviser Association supports the Obama’s administration’s efforts to ban mandatory arbitration clauses in securities contracts.
In draft legislation for the Investor Protection Act of 2009, the administration issued guidelines that would give the Securities and Exchange Commission authority to prohibit or restrict mandatory arbitration clauses that brokerage firms typically include in customer contracts.
“We support the administration’s proposal,” said David Tittsworth, executive director and executive vice president of the IAA, which represents SEC-registered investment advisers. “We think that investors should have the choice to select a dispute resolution forum.”
The arbitration issue will likely to be debated next Tuesday at a House Financial Services Committee hearing at which industry groups will testify on adviser and other regulatory reform issues.
Predictably, the brokerage industry is opposed to a ban on mandatory arbitration agreements.
The SEC should study the issue, said Kevin Carroll, managing director and associate general counsel of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.
However, “It wouldn’t make any sense to give the SEC unfettered power to ban pre-dispute arbitration agreements without the benefit of study,” he said in an e-mail. “It would be unfair to investors and securities firms.”
Most investment advisory firms do not use mandatory arbitration agreements, Mr. Tittsworth said.
The arbitration forum operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. “can create a perception of unfairness, regardless of its actual results,” he said.
The North American Securities Administrators Association Inc. also supports banning mandatory arbitration clauses in securities industry contracts. The Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009 (H.R. 1020 and S. 931) was introduced earlier in the year by Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., and by Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis. The legislation would ban mandatory arbitration clauses widely used in many industries.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Incoming NAPFA head looks to keep advisers from growing up, out of group

Incoming NAPFA chairman William Baldwin is looking to find ways to keep firms involved in the 2,150-member organization once they get larger.

State regulator says SEC dropped the ball on private placements

Don't blame state regulators for the financial crisis; blame those who took power away from state regulators.

Should annuities be mandatory for 401(k)s? Fund companies go on the offensive

Participants in 401(k) plans do not want the government to require them to convert a portion of their 401(k) assets to annuities, according to the results of a survey of about 3,000 households released today by the Investment Company Institute.

Labor chief wants to add annuities to 401(k) mix

Encouraging employers to offer annuities in pension plans will be one of the Labor Department's top regulatory goals in 2010.

Schapiro: SEC will act on 12(b)-1 fees this year

The Securities and Exchange Commission will reassess the 12(b)-1 fees collected by brokers as compensation for selling and servicing mutual funds, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said today.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print