Subscribe

Galvin asks Congress to force 401(k) plan disclosures

Massachusetts' chief securities regulator Wiliam Galvin has asked Congress to force 401(k) plan disclosures, ratcheting up pressure to force transparency in retirement accounts.

Massachusetts’ chief securities regulator called on Congress and the U.S. Department of Labor to force companies to disclose any changes to the timing of 401(k) plan contributions to workers.
“Employees should be told the potential risks involved in a significant change, such as a shift to a year-end annual employer match,” Secretary William F. Galvin said Thursday in a statement. “They should be told before the change occurs.”
Companies across industries are squeezing 401(k) contributions by holding back on the amount and timing of their matching funds to employees, making it harder for U.S. workers to save for retirement, Bloomberg News reported in February. If employers make matching contributions at the end of the year, employees miss out on gains that could accrue during the year. Some workers may also lose out if they leave the company before year-end.
Mr. Galvin’s unit sent letters earlier this year to 28 of the largest providers of 401(k) plans, requesting the number of employers who pay distributions at year-end, when the move was made from more frequent payroll periods and what workers are told about the potential consequences.
Mr. Galvin said his unit was unable to obtain data from service providers who said they were bound by contracts with employers or would not provide the information without a subpoena.
AOL CONTROVERSY
A move by AOL Inc. (AOL) in February called attention to employers who pay their matching contribution once a year, when CEO Tim Armstrong announced plans to make payments in one sum at the end of the year after citing spiraling health-care costs. The announcement sparked a controversy, and within days, Armstrong apologized and the company reversed its decision.
Mr. Galvin in a report Thursday recommended rules requiring companies to tell workers about changes to their 401(k) plans in advance and about the potential costs. While employers have to provide a summary to the Labor Department and participants of a material modification to their retirement plan, federal law doesn’t require them to disclose the financial risk of a shift to a lump-sum matching contribution, according to Mr. Galvin’s statement.
(Bloomberg News)

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Time to end mandatory arbitration

Requiring investors to relinquish their legal rights is fundamentally wrong

Biggest RIA gainers

$1B+ fee-only RIAs ranked by year-over-year growth in total assets.

Women in Advice

Inspiring the Next Generation of Financial Advisers.

Companies from Facebook to JPMorgan squeeze 401(k) plans

Tactics include holding back on both the amount and timing of 401(k) matches and dragging out vesting schedules.

GMO’s Grantham: Stocks near bubble, but there’s nothing to pop it

Money manager says the market still has room to run, but admits allocating assets in today's environment is not easy.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print