Subscribe

B-Ds lose VA revenue to insurers’ cuts, reductions

Tumult on the variable annuity scene is dampening sales at broker-dealers, raising some concerns about the impact on…

Tumult on the variable annuity scene is dampening sales at broker-dealers, raising some concerns about the impact on revenue for the firms and their representatives.

Efforts by life insurers over the past 18 months to cut investment selection, reduce income and withdrawal benefits, and curb additional contributions to contracts are helping insurers reduce risk tied to their VA exposure. But distributors are paying the price for some of that conservatism as reps turn up their noses at the changes and become more reluctant to sell.

“Like most other broker-dealers, we are seeing a decrease in variable annuity sales over the last six or seven months,” said Vere Reynolds-Hale, national sales manager at First Allied Securities Inc. “What you're seeing is an industry shifting and adjusting to the current economy.”

VA sales at First Allied in the first six months of this year were off by about 15% from a year earlier, according to Mr. Reynolds-Hale.

The same held true at Raymond James Financial Inc. and at ValMark Securities Inc.

TRENDING DOWNWARD

Industry data from the first quarter — the most recent period for which figures are available — show that VA sales have been trending downward. The first-quarter figures show that $36.8 billion in variable annuities were sold, compared with $38 billion in the previous quarter and $39.5 billion a year earlier, according to LIMRA.

Reduced features on living-benefit riders have contributed to the slip in sales, industry experts said.

Some insurers have taken the extra step of moderating VA volumes by limiting the amount of money that clients can add to legacy contracts: As of today, MetLife Inc. no longer will take new contributions to blocks of old VA contracts that are tied to attractive living and death benefits.

“Sales are down, but recurring revenue and trails are up, so we're basically flat for the year,” said Scott Stolz, president of Raymond James Insurance Group, explaining how the firm will cope with the lost VA money.

One question is whether the adviser marketplace will come to embrace these products again, said Greg Cherry, senior analyst at Aite Group LLC's wealth management practice, noting that the rate environment could push commission revenue down for some time.

But at the individual-practice level, and for reps for whom a significant chunk of their business comes from VA sales, the prospect of unappealing products and less opportunity to add money to contracts are reasons to steer away from variable annuities.

Lower sales and less money going into legacy VA products means less in commissions for reps, which eventually can take a toll on an individual practice, said Judson Forner, an investment analyst with ValMark.

“TURNED OFF’

“If you sell your business, you'll get a better multiple if you have trail income,” he said. “The fact that the insurance companies can change that worries advisers about their future income and about their future liquidation if they want to sell their book. In a way, advisers are turned off by the fact that at the whim of a particular carrier, their livelihood can be thrown into disarray.”

Although revenue stemming from new VA sales will make up a smaller piece of the bottom line, advisers and firms are seeing activity pick up in other investments.

“A lot of people are migrating toward managed accounts with exchange-traded funds,” said Richard Dragotta, a branch manager with LPL Financial LLC.

Mutual funds and ETFs become more attractive as firms move to a fee-based model and encourage clients to think about product allocation, according to Bing Waldert, a director at Cerulli Associates Inc.

“If you're driving the conversation to clients to look at the whole picture, and you find that they need to diversify, you'll probably use a mutual fund or an ETF to fill those gaps,” he said.

FEE-BASED ACCOUNTS

At First Allied, Mr. Reynolds-Hale expects fee-based accounts to drive revenue.

The firm last fall launched a program called Allocation Architect to encourage advisers to take a holistic view of clients' holdings and to talk to them about their asset and product allocation.

Variable annuities aren't anathema to fee-based accounts, Mr. Reynolds-Hale said.

“Variable annuities are part of that play and how you can fit them into a fee-based wrap account,” he said.

Although the pickings are slim among VA providers, it is hard to find an alternative to the guarantees that a client can obtain only through an insurance product, Mr. Dragotta said.

“It may not be as good as it once was, but for the right person, it's the only way to provide guaranteed cash flow,” he said.

[email protected] Twitter: @darla_mercado

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

As indexed universal life sales climb, be sure to mind the risks

Advisers need to bear in mind that this cousin of traditional universal life insurance requires unique precautions.

Donald Sterling’s battle holds harsh lessons for advisers

The L.A. Clippers owner's fight with pro basketball highlights important tax and estate strategies that may surprise you.

Advisers fall short on implementation of long-term-care insurance

Most know it's a key part of retirement planning but lack in-depth knowledge when the need for care arises.

Broker-dealers face administrative hurdles in rollout of QLAC annuity

Confusion remains over who ensures the contract purchase meets Treasury's guidelines.

Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

Broker and wirehouse embroiled in a three-year dispute over a promissory note.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print