Subscribe

Fiduciary advocate charged with plan theft worked for CalSTRS

CalSTRS CalSTRS: Who screened the screener?

Giant pension fund retained Hutcheson last year to help with vetting of advisers; terminated contract in four months

Matthew D. Hutcheson, who is facing charges for allegedly diverting money from plan clients, was hired last year by the California State Teachers’ Retirement System.
CalSTRS — the third-largest plan sponsor in the nation, with $139.5 billion in assets, according to sister publication Pensions & Investments — executed a contract with Mr. Hutcheson in June 2011. CalSTRS spokesman Ricardo Duran said the fund’s executives hired the high-profile 401(k) fiduciary advocate to provide an online process for vetting and screening advisers who wanted to work with school employees in California.
The retirement system terminated the contract only four months later Oct. 18, citing Mr. Hutcheson’s “failure to perform the services under the agreement,” Mr. Duran said.
But according to an e-mail from Mr. Hutcheson’s attorney, Dennis Charney, the adviser was unable to perform the services “due to the theft of intellectual property necessary to complete the tasks set forth in the contract. That matter will be addressed in court at a later date.”
CalSTRS did not pay the fiduciary and doesn’t have any connection to the allegations the U.S. Attorney’s office has filed against Mr. Hutcheson, Mr. Duran said.
Both the Labor Department and its Employee Benefits Security Administration were involved in the investigation that ultimately led to Mr. Hutcheson’s arrest this month.
Aside from allegedly using plan assets for personal purchases, the U.S. Attorney’s Office claims that Mr. Hutcheson also used plan dollars to acquire a golf course and ski lodge at the Tamarack Resort in Idaho.
Federal authorities are seeking $5.3 million in forfeitures from him. The renowned plan adviser, who has appeared before Congress to advocate the fiduciary standard, has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges and is awaiting a June 12 trial.
Mr. Charney said the federal case has two branches. “One branch alleges Matt used investor funds for personal expenses,” he said. “That allegation is denied in its entirety.”
The other branch, Mr. Charney said, is the allegation that Mr. Hutcheson used plan dollars to invest in the golf course. “Under ERISA, [Matt] had full discretion to do so,” the attorney said. “Thus, this activity was not criminal in nature and we intend to fully defend all the allegations in court.”

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

As indexed universal life sales climb, be sure to mind the risks

Advisers need to bear in mind that this cousin of traditional universal life insurance requires unique precautions.

Donald Sterling’s battle holds harsh lessons for advisers

The L.A. Clippers owner's fight with pro basketball highlights important tax and estate strategies that may surprise you.

Advisers fall short on implementation of long-term-care insurance

Most know it's a key part of retirement planning but lack in-depth knowledge when the need for care arises.

Broker-dealers face administrative hurdles in rollout of QLAC annuity

Confusion remains over who ensures the contract purchase meets Treasury's guidelines.

Finra arbitration panel awards $500,000 to former Morgan Stanley rep

Broker and wirehouse embroiled in a three-year dispute over a promissory note.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print