Subscribe

Finra: Defunct firm, execs hid distress

WJB Capital Group Inc. and two of its top executives settled allegations that it masked the firm's financial…

WJB Capital Group Inc. and two of its top executives settled allegations that it masked the firm's financial difficulties and traded securities without sufficient capital during the two years before it closed in January, according to industry regulators.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. said that the firm, and specifically chief executive Craig Rothfeld and chief financial officer Gregory Maleski, misstated balance sheet and net-capital calculations.

The firm, which had trading desks in Boston, Denver, New York and San Francisco, had about 100 employees when it closed, Finra said.

“Both WJB's CEO and CFO hid the precarious financial condition of the firm, misstating the FOCUS reports and net-capital calculations by as much as $4.4 million per month over a two-year period,” Brad Bennett, Finra's chief of enforcement, said in a statement.

“FORGIVABLE LOANS’

The firm and executives misstated WJB's balance sheet and other records by improperly treating nearly $10 million in compensation that was paid to 28 employees as “forgivable loans,” Finra said.

WJB's balance sheet during its last three years “would have reflected substantial losses in addition to those that it was already experiencing” if finances were correctly accounted for, the Finra consent agreement said.

Under the terms of the Finra deal, the firm was expelled, Mr. Rothfeld was barred from the securities industry and Mr. Maleski was barred from acting in a principal capacity. They neither admitted nor denied the allegations.

Tom McCabe, a New York attorney who represents the defunct firm and the executives, declined to comment.

A second attorney, George Brunelle of Brunelle & Hadjikow PC, didn't return a call seeking comment.

WJB and the two executives also falsely misclassified certain items as allowable for net-capital purposes, including $1.6 million in funds from providing “non-deal road shows” and third-party research, and a $1.5 million loan the firm received from its clearing firm, Finra said.

As a result, the firm traded in securities when it had a level of net capital that was below what was required of it by the the Securities and Exchange Commission.

[email protected] Twitter: @skinnerliz

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Celebration of women fostering diversity in the financial advice profession

Honoring the 2020 and 2019 InvestmentNews Women to Watch for their achievements and dedication to improving the financial advice profession.

Merrill Lynch veteran Michelle Avan dies

Avan recently became SVP and head of global women's and under-represented talent strategy, global human resources for Bank of America.

Finalists for Women in Asset Management Awards announced

More than 100 individuals were named on the short list for awards in 16 categories; the winners will be announced on Sept. 9.

Rethinking advisory fees means figuring out value

Most advisers still charge AUM-based fees, but that's not likely to be the case in 10 years, according to Bob Veres. Some advisers are now experimenting with alternative fee models.

Advisers need focus on growth and relationships, especially now

Business development expert Robyn Crane believes financial advisers need to be taking advantage of this unique time.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print