Subscribe

Finra OKs plan on incentive pay

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.'s board has approved a controversial proposal that would require brokers to disclose…

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.'s board has approved a controversial proposal that would require brokers to disclose the amount of incentive pay that they received to switch firms.

Recruiting compensation of $100,000 or more — including signing, upfront or back-end bonuses, loans, accelerated payouts and transition assistance — would have to be disclosed to any customer who followed a broker to a new firm within one year of his or her transition. The broker also would have to disclose future compensation based on performance.

The reporting threshold was increased from the $50,000 level in the original Finra proposal released this year.

Finra officials say that the rule is designed to highlight potential conflicts of interest for brokers who move from firm to firm.

“FULLY INFORMED DECISION’

“This proposal is about making sure the customer can make a fully informed decision to follow a broker to a new firm and understand the cost associated with transferring his or her account,” Finra chief executive Richard G. Ketchum said in a statement. “This proposal reflects our commitment to transparency and investor protection.”

The original proposal generated about 65 comment letters and a steady stream of criticism from independent broker-dealers and financial advisers.

Wirehouse firms generally support the rule, while critics contend that it should have included retention bonuses. The proposal doesn't address that issue.

The Financial Services Institute Inc., which represents independent broker-dealers and financial advisers, said that it is pleased that the reporting threshold was raised to $100,000, from $50,000, but it is waiting for more details before deciding whether to support the rule.

“We look forward to closely examining Finra's proposal to see if it achieves the goal of providing investors with meaningful disclosure of material conflicts of interest without unnecessarily compromising financial advisers' privacy,” said David Bellaire, the FSI's executive vice president and general counsel.

The higher limit for reporting gives the independent sector a break.

“Most of the transition packages in the independent channel fall under the $100,000 benchmark,” said Jon Henschen, president of Henschen & Associates LLC, a broker recruiting firm. “They won't have any disclosure requirements.”

Firms would have to disclose to customers compensation paid to new recruits in the ranges of $100,000 to $500,000, $500,000 to $1 million and higher. They also would have to report to Finra any significant increases in a new hire's compensation over his or her first year if it amounted to 25%, or $100,000, whichever were higher.

Finra intends to use the information to target examinations of sales abuses.

In addition, firms would have to tell customers following a broker whether they would incur costs for moving their assets and whether some of them couldn't be transferred.

The rule now goes to the Securities and Exchange Commission for review and approval. The SEC may make revisions and put the proposal out for comment.

CAREER DECISIONS

While the SEC mulls over the rule, its advance may spur some brokers to make career decisions.

“In the short term, it may accelerate the moves of advisers who are on the fence,” said Mindy Diamond, president of Diamond Consultants LLC, a search and consulting firm.

Advisers with high-net-worth clients aren't too concerned about the rule, according to Ms. Diamond, who said that smaller advisers who generate about $1 million in revenue annually and whose clients have about $500,000 in assets might be put off by the new disclosures.

“It's tough to tell those clients you're being paid $3 million to switch firms,” Ms. Diamond said.

Wirehouses are backing the rule because they are getting tired of paying huge recruiting incentives and are looking to Finra for help, Mr. Henschen said.

“They're the obvious motivators in pushing this through,” he said. “Crony capitalism lives.”

The regulator weighed input from the comment letters and proposed a rule that achieves “a great balance,” John “Jack” Brennan, the Finra board's lead governor and chairman emeritus of The Vanguard Group Inc., said on Finra's website.

“In many ways, it's the best of the Finra rule-making process,” he said.

[email protected] Twitter: @markschoeff

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print