Subscribe

In latest A-share discount snafu, broker-dealer pays $1.37 million to clients

Lincoln Investment Planning overcharged certain clients for 7 1/2 years.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. flagged another broker-dealer for not giving clients discounts when they bought mutual fund A shares, this time reaching a settlement with Lincoln Investment Planning in which the firm paid $1.37 million to clients whom it overcharged between January 2011 and this June.

Lincoln, which currently has more than 1,500 registered reps, for the last 7½ years “disadvantaged certain retirement plan and charitable organization customers who were eligible to purchase class A shares in certain mutual funds without a front-end sales charge,” according to the order. “Those eligible customers were instead sold class A shares with a front-end sales charge or class B or C shares with back-end sales charges and higher ongoing fees and expenses.”

Over the period in question, Lincoln Investment Planning did not have a supervisory system and procedures designed to ensure that eligible clients who bought mutual funds got the benefit of sales charge waivers, according to the order.

“We self-reported this to Finra and had no client complaints,” said Edward Forst, CEO of Lincoln Investment Planning. “Because of the way we handled the matter, we had no fine from Finra.”

Securities regulators recently have been focused consistently on whether broker-dealers and registered investment advisers give the proper discounts to clients who buy mutual fund A shares.

In February, the Securities and Exchange Commission launched an initiative to waive fines against investment advisers who come forward and admit that they had been putting clients into high-fee mutual fund classes and agree to reimburse those clients.

And in December, Finra noted in its summary of 2017 exam findings its concern about brokers recommending high-fee share classes without determining whether they’re suitable for their clients.

Finra also censured Lincoln Investment Planning over the matter. The firm accepted the settlement without admitting or denying Finra’s findings.

Finra noted in its order that in resolving the issue, it recognized Lincoln Investment Planning’s “extraordinary cooperation,” including initiating the investigation into the client discounts and providing restitution to clients over a 7½-year period.

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Broker who took client funds for 17 years is barred

"A broker admitting that he has been ripping off clients for 17 years is beyond troubling," said one attorney.

SEC boots California RIA linked to crypto, private funds

"Nobody knows what’s happening internally in these pooled funds at the retail level," said one plaintiff's attorney.

Former head of Osaic B-D lands at AssetMark

"Having relationships with financial advisors is one of the greatest assets these senior executives possess," said one industry official.

Colorado bars advisor over high-risk options trades

"Buying options is fraught with risk for financial advisors," one attorney noted.

Finra bars two ex-Raymond James advisors who sold unapproved products

Firms must take reasonable steps to avoid financial advisors' selling away, one compliance expert noted.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print