Subscribe

Schwab ordered to pay investor $144,000 for allegedly unsuitable complex ETF

Dominic Ismert's attorney said the recommendation to invest in an oil fund was made 'off the cuff,' without appropriate research and analysis of whether it was suitable for him.

Dominic Ismert decided to get back into investing nearly three years, but he lost a substantial amount of money on what his attorney said was “off the cuff” advice from a financial advisor at Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. to buy shares in a complex exchange-traded fund.

Ismert cited “flawed investment recommendations” as one of his causes of action in a Finra arbitration claim he filed against Schwab in August 2020 after holding the United States Oil Fund from March until June of that year. He lost more than $500,000.

Three public arbitrators in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. dispute resolution system found Schwab liable and awarded Ismert and his designated beneficiary plan $144,000 in damages plus interest, according to a Feb. 7 award.

“We’re very pleased with the decision,” said Jason Haselkorn, one of the lawyers who represented Ismert. “It’s a significant award against a major broker-dealer. Our client had the wherewithal to go up against a [firm] with substantial resources, and he got a positive result.”

An online description of the U.S. Oil Fund ETF warns investors of the fund’s derivative nature and that it’s not a proxy for investing directly in the U.S. oil markets. Haselkorn said the investment wasn’t suitable for his client, a small business owner in the Kansas City, Missouri, area.

“The recommendation was made off the cuff without sufficient research or analysis,” said Haselkorn, owner of the law firm Haselkorn & Thibaut.

Finra and other regulators have been increasing their scrutiny of complex products. The arbitration award didn’t indicate the reasoning behind the arbitrators’ decision.

Schwab defended its level of customer care and pointed out that Ismert obtained only part of the $550,000 in compensatory damages he had requested.

“With our ‘Through Our Clients Eyes’ perspective at the center of everything we do, Schwab remains committed to providing excellent service while delivering the high level of value they have come to expect from us,” Schwab spokesman Peter Greenley said in a statement. “While we disagree with [Ismert’s] allegations, we are pleased the arbitrators awarded only a fraction of what he sought.”

Haselkorn said Ismert’s win wasn’t diminished by the size of his payout given who he was taking on.

“We’ve got a client who tried to go up against a very large institution, and he came away with an award well over six figures,” Haselkorn said.

[More: The complexity of ETF options]

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print