Subscribe

Hedge fund investors are sick of paying for “skill-less returns”

A coalition of pensions, endowments, and other institutional investors are demanding a change to the fees they're charged.

Institutional investors have grown tired of paying fees to hedge funds for what they see as “skill-less returns.” 

Roughly two dozen pensions, endowments, sovereign wealth funds and others — with more than $200 billion in combined hedge fund investments — are demanding changes to how the money managers get paid.  

Investors led by the Teacher Retirement System of Texas are seeking performance-fee hurdles, according to an open letter to the hedge fund industry published Thursday. The coalition wants hedge funds to forgo incentive fees until they generate returns that beat 3-month Treasuries, which now yield more than 5%.  

For years, hedge fund fees have frustrated investors. The biggest and best-performing funds often charge clients 2% of assets managed and 20% of profits. In 2019, Element Capital Management famously jacked up its incentive fee to 40%. It has lost money over the past three years.

In 2023, average management and performance fees hit the highest since at least 2015 — 1.7% and 17.7%, respectively, according to a January report from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Multistrategy funds, which pass along a variety of costs to their investors, are even more expensive. Last year, clients of such firms received 41 cents of every dollar earned by funds that passed on all costs, down from 54 cents in 2021, according to a BNP Paribas SA prime brokerage report. 

Cash hurdles will fix a “misalignment that has been present in fee structures throughout the maturation of the hedge fund industry,” the investors, known as limited partners, wrote in the letter. They include University of Texas Investment Management Co., Singapore sovereign-wealth fund GIC Pte and Canadian pension fund Caisse de Depot et Placement du Quebec.  

With interest rates elevated, hedge fund managers have been able to collect incentive fees on returns that required little skill to achieve, according to the investors.

“Earning cash returns is not the reason institutional LPs invest in hedge funds,” they wrote.

Last year, a $1 billion hedge fund could have made about $52 million just from holding cash, the signatories said. If the fund charged a 20% performance fee, that would translate into more than $10 million “for taking zero risk.”

This isn’t the first time the Texas teachers pension, which has about $20 billion invested in hedge funds, has led the charge for more favorable fees. 

In 2016, it urged money managers to adopt a “1-or-30” structure. That means a hedge fund would charge the greater of a 1% management fee or a 30% cut of gains in excess of a benchmark.

Related Topics: , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Ackman’s US closed-end fund set to debut at $50 per share

Seeking $25B from retail investors, Pershing Square's upcoming offering could become the largest closed-end fund in the country.

Critics question Finra as watchdog’s caseload plunges

Enforcement actions hit an all-time low last year while fines plummeted to half of 2016 haul, raising doubts about its effectiveness.

Ether, Solana overshadowing Bitcoin as ETFs approach

SEC expected to give full approval to new crypto funds.

Mexico opts to keep rates at 11% amid volatile peso

Governor hints at space for rate cuts ahead.

Global funds pull back from Chinese stocks

China's slowing economy and earnings are in focus.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print