The trend that's been driving fees in the world of asset management relentlessly lower has finally reached its (il)logical conclusion. The Securities and Exchange Commission has just approved an exchange-traded fund with negative fees. It's further evidence, if any were needed, that the rush to the cheap seats is unlikely to halt anytime soon — and that fund managers need to continue adjusting to their straitened circumstances.
Salt Financial will launch its Salt Low truBeta ETF by paying investors 50 cents for every $1,000 invested until the fund reaches $100 million — which the firm says is the minimum size to get listed on brokerage and advisory platforms — at which point the fee reverts to $2.90.
Of course it's a bit of a gimmick designed to attract publicity, and the firm can still earn a crust by lending out the stocks it buys and charging the borrowers a fee.
But it does also highlight the winner-takes-all aspect of the ETF market, where the top three firms — BlackRock, Vanguard Group and State Street Corp. — control more than 80% of U.S. assets, according to figures compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence. Even in Europe, almost 65% of the market is in the hands of BlackRock, DWS Group and Societe Generale.
"David needed a slingshot to take down Goliath — we need a negative-fee model to force our way in," Salt Financial president and co-founder Alfred Eskandar told the Financial Times. "New ETF issuers have two choices. They can do their best to survive for the six years it takes on average to get to $100 million, or they can do something more drastic that gets them there quicker."
As my Bloomberg Intelligence colleague Eric Balchunas said in March, the
ETF market is a "Terrordrome" where 97% of 2018's net flows of almost $500 billion that flowed into passive funds was allocated to products charging 0.2% or less.
"Cheap is where virtually all the investment dollars are flowing," he wrote.
And demographics suggest there's more to come.
Charles Schwab Corp. just released a
survey of ETF users that shows a generational divide between younger savers, who've embraced the low-cost simplicity of the products, and older investors who remain a bit more skeptical of their usefulness.https://cdn-res.keymedia.com/investmentnews/uploads/assets/graphics src="/wp-content/uploads2019/05/CI119722515.PNG"
Some 68% of all of those surveyed said they plan to increase their ETF investments in the coming year, up from 54% in the 2018 survey. When split by age, though, the percentage of younger investors expecting to increase their reliance on ETFs is markedly higher.
As the grim reaper slowly but steadily culls the older generation, mathematics means there'll be a corresponding increase in the proportion of younger investors who've been bombarded in recent years by articles and reports arguing that the returns available from active investment products don't come close to justifying their higher fees. The immutable laws of demographics mean the shift to passive strategies will accelerate.
Mark Gilbert is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering asset management.
