High-yield bonds are likely not the first thing that comes to mind as a category for ESG investing, but several U.S. fund managers are taking an interest in this small but growing area of the market.
Currently, total assets in high-yield ESG mutual funds and exchange-traded funds sit at around $2 billion among just 12 products, data from Morningstar Direct show. That’s just over 0.5% of the total $351 billion in the U.S. high-yield bond fund market.
But if it’s any hint of things to come, six of the 12 funds on the market were launched in the past two years, not including a new ETF from Fidelity. And it’s likely that high yield will see the same treatment as other asset classes. Across investment styles, a record number of new ESG funds are being launched.
In the prolonged low-interest-rate environment, high-yield bond funds have offered investors better returns, on average, than investment-grade corporate bond funds over one, three and five years, data from Morningstar Direct show. Across U.S. mutual funds and ETFs, investment-grade bond funds saw total returns of -6% over a year, 1% over three years and 1.6% over five, through April. Meanwhile, high-yield funds returned -4.6%, 2.3% and 3% during those time frames.
Returns for ESG high-yield funds were somewhat similar, at -5.8%, 2.1% and 3, according to Morningstar Direct.
The slight lag in performance recently for some of those ESG funds is due in part to the exclusion of oil and gas securities. The energy sector has had strong returns over the past year, and energy companies made up 13% of Morningstar’s U.S. High-Yield Bond Index as of the end of February, Gabriel Denis, senior manager research analyst for Morningstar, said in an email.
“An ESG high-yield fund practicing a strict exclusionary policy could end up excluding a major part of their potential investment universe; this could potentially have a noticeable impact on the fund’s tracking error relative to their benchmark and lower these funds’ portfolio diversification,” Denis said.
Impax Asset Management, the adviser to the Pax World Funds, is among a number of groups that have gone fossil-fuel free across the firm. Peter Schwab, the portfolio manager for the oldest ESG high-yield bond fund in the U.S., the $690.8 million Pax High-Yield Bond Fund, which launched in 1999, said the fund was the last product to exclude those holdings, removing them from the portfolio a year ago.
A leading factor in that decision was the volatility of the high-yield energy sector, he said. “It was driven mostly by a desire for better long-term performance.”
The company’s approach is more thematic from a sector basis than peer funds might be, and Impax has the advantage of an in-house ESG research team whose work informs the portfolio managers’ decisions, Schwab said.
Although some investors seek exclusion policies for oil and gas within their funds, fund managers have argued that by investing in these energy groups they are able to engage with management on their transition to a net-zero world.
Jim Schaeffer, global head of leveraged finance at Aegon Asset Management, pointed out that the firm’s U.S. High-Yield ESG institutional strategy underweights energy relative to its benchmark, which took a toll on its performance during the fourth quarter.
“Through a credit cycle, you can achieve outperformance in a high-yield strategy. You’re picking high-quality companies that are going to perform well,” Schaeffer said. “We believe we can achieve similar results in our ESG strategy.”
The key, he said, is “having a research platform in place.”
“We’ve always evaluated the ESG components in the way we underwrite our credits,” Schaeffer said.
Aegon also subadvises the $19.5 million Transamerica High-Yield ESG Fund, which launched in 2020. That fund has its lowest sector allocation to energy, at less than 4%. By comparison, consumer discretionary makes up more than 20% of its portfolio, followed by industrials at about 16%.
The next step for high-yield funds will likely be a focus on sustainability, such as aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Schaeffer said.
A tricky point in the high-yield ESG world is that smaller companies, often private, disclose much less than large public businesses and tend to lack net-zero goals.
“The smaller the company, the less bang for your buck you’re going to have” on engagement, Schaeffer said. But it’s still early days in the high-yield ESG market, and “over time, you’ll see the whole landscape of engagement pick up.”
As more investment firms enter the space, smaller energy companies could have difficulty raising capital if they don’t have sustainability goals and are therefore excluded from funds, he said. “That’s the impact you can have.”
High-yield issuances represent a small piece of the bond market but have a considerably large carbon footprint, said Erika Karp, chief impact officer at Pathstone.
“High yield is about 3% of the fixed-income universe. From a sustainability standpoint, it accounts for about a third of all emissions,” Karp said. Based on data from MSCI, there are 1,000 or fewer yield issuers, “but only about 15% even disclose what their emissions are,” she said. “It’s a tiny little universe.”
Pathstone, a family office, uses one high-yield strategy that incorporates ESG, Karp said.
In the “best-in-class” ESG analysis among both ratings agencies and asset managers, company disclosures are important but often don’t paint a complete picture, and it’s even trickier in the high-yield arena.
“Public companies tend to produce more detailed and more consistently available disclosures around items like their Scope 1-3 emissions, diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, and governance practices than private companies,” Denis said.
Since many companies in the high-yield space are private, “high-yield bond fund managers need to undertake an additional level of due diligence with these companies in order to collect the same level of data that is available to, as one example, a large-cap equity fund manager,” he said.
Impax, for example, has an in-house team of five who evaluate ESG for all securities, Schwab said.
“This is all they do, day-to-day. And we work very closely with them,” he said.
Not all asset managers employ ESG teams to help inform investment decisions, and changing that can be a delicate process, Schwab said.
“The trick with that, at most high-yield managers, is that credit managers feel imposed on a little bit, by these people,” he said. “They’re offering their advice from an ESG perspective on a company or issue, and the sector analyst is supposed to somehow integrate that into their decisions. That can get really clunky.”
The youngest fund on the market, which launched in February, is Fidelity’s Sustainable High-Yield ETF. That product, which is actively managed, uses quantitative and fundamental analysis to help select bonds with potential for high returns and low probability of default, according to Fidelity.
Around two years ago, the company began considering how to implement an official ESG ratings and research process across issues and asset classes, said Ben Harrison, portfolio manager in Fidelity’s high-yield group. The company excludes issuers that fail to meet certain levels of ESG ratings, and where the company doesn’t yet have a rating, it can rely on those from MSCI, Sustainalytics or others.
ESG “is part of the analysis of an issuer,” Harrison said, much like factors like cost and availability of capital, customer reception and off-balance liabilities.
“If you’re prudently investing, you should be taking all of those things into account,” he said.
High yield is dramatically different in concentration risk from large-cap funds that track the S&P 500, where 10 companies represent 30% of the index, Harrison noted.
“Here … there are 1,000 issuers in the [ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained] index, and the biggest one is 2% of the index. And it falls away from there,” he said.
That is a non-ESG benchmark, but the fund seeks to outperform it.
“The securities in our portfolio all have favorable ESG ratings … At the same time, we want the [overall yield, duration and sector weights of the] portfolio to look like a regular high-yield portfolio,” said lead portfolio manager Michael Cheng. “ESG risk is investment risk.”
Driven by robust transaction activity amid market turbulence and increased focus on billion-dollar plus targets, Echelon Partners expects another all-time high in 2025.
The looming threat of federal funding cuts to state and local governments has lawmakers weighing a levy that was phased out in 1981.
The fintech firms' new tools and integrations address pain points in overseeing investment lineups, account monitoring, and more.
Canadian stocks are on a roll in 2025 as the country prepares to name a new Prime Minister.
Carson is expanding one of its relationships in Florida while Lido Advisors adds an $870 million practice in Silicon Valley.
RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.
As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.
