Subscribe

‘Sallie, Sallie, Sallie!’

The Headhunter wonders why Sallie Krawcheck's departure registered as an earth shattering day in the history of the retail brokerage business.

“Sallie, Sallie, Sallie!!!” (picture Sarch whining, like Jan Brady complaining about Marcia all those years ago). The calls, texts and e-mails started coming on Tuesday night and lasted all day on Wednesday. “Did you hear about Sallie?” “What do you think about Sallie?” Every reporter wanted a comment and every Adviser and Manager wanted to talk about this before talking about anything else. And it was always “Sallie”, never “Krawcheck.” Is this big news because Ms. Krawcheck has somehow achieved first name recognition status like Madonna and Cher?
Though Ms. Krawcheck had two separate stints running wealth management at Smith Barney, sandwiching her time as CFO at Citi (has anyone ever examined to what extent Citi’s balance sheet became overleveraged during her time as CFO? But I digress.), many Merrill Advisers questioned her leadership abilities because she herself had never been a retail broker. That said, many also praised her ability to connect with top Advisers as well as large clients. And criticism of her never included her work ethic.
There will be many articles over the next few weeks which will dissect her tenure at B of A. Maybe one day we will see a tell-all book about her career. What perplexes me is why some seem to think that this is an earth shattering day in the history of retail brokerage.
One possibility is that Ms. Krawcheck was arguably the most powerful woman on Wall Street. In an industry where less than 20% of the Advisers are women, a woman had risen to the top of two of the most venerable names in the business. So, her departure, whether pushed or voluntary, is, of course, big news.
But it won’t matter next week.
Next week, Merrill Lynch will still be part of Bank of America. Bank of America will still have mortgage woes which are keeping its stock below its supposed book value. And Merrill Lynch Advisers and their clients will still be reading about B of A’s problems in the newspapers. You see, next week and for the foreseeable future, B of A’s woes are a big story; the lawsuits are not being settled or adjudicated anytime soon. As one Merrill Adviser told me: “Sallie’s leaving just gives my clients another thing to talk about which is not a positive, just like the lawsuits. Instead of spending all of my time helping my clients with solutions, they now think that part of the problem is the firm that I work for, the place where they have their money. And that sucks.”

Related Topics: , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Is recruiting happening in the COVID world?

For wealth managers and advisers, recruiting is a contact sport. But 'contact' is now a four-letter word

As wealth management firms try to hold onto assets, they don’t always get what they pay for

Firms pay retiring brokers for their clients' assets, but clients often take their business elsewhere.

Independence means different things to different people in wealth management

Some define it as starting their own firm, while others insist it means having full control over investment products and client relationships

Wirehouses are losing the war for client assets

Firms like Schwab are raking in assets at a much faster clip than the big brokerages.

Regional firms provide an alternative to wirehouses

As big brokerages lose their competitive edge, regionals are offering a home to advisers who want to stay in the employee channel.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print