Subscribe

Northern Trust target dates called out in two 401(k) lawsuits

statue-with-scales-in-front-of-pile-of-law-books

The similar cases, against Allstate and Northern Trust, were also brought by the same law firms

Two 401(k) plan lawsuits filed over the past several days by the same law firms involve Northern Trust’s target-date CITs.

The complaints, brought by the Law Offices of Michael M. Mulder and Scott and Scott, separately name Allstate Corporation and Northern Trust Company. The two complaints are very similarly worded, with both alleging that the plan sponsors breached their fiduciary duties by opting for the North Trust target-date collective investment trust series and continuing to keep it on their plan menus for years.

“Despite a market flush with better-performing alternatives, defendants selected the Northern Trust Focus Funds to be the plan’s target date asset class investment option,” the two complaints both stated. “For nearly a decade, the Northern Trust Focus Funds have performed worse than 70% to 90% of peer funds.”

The cases were brought in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. The lawsuit against Allstate was filed Oct. 30, and the one against Northern Trust was brought on Nov. 2.

Both cases cite Morningstar data pointing to stronger net returns for years in target-date products from American Funds, T. Rowe Price and Vanguard. Underperformance cost participants in the Northern Trust plan a projected $34 million in unrealized potential returns since 2014, while participants in the Allstate plan suffered an alleged $65 million shortcoming, according to the complaint.

Allstate’s plan represents more than $5 billion, about $763 million of which is invested in the Northern Trust Focus Funds, according to the complaint in that case. The more-than $2 billion Northern Trust plan included $350 million in the target-date series, the other lawsuit stated.

Both cases seek class-action status and allege breach of fiduciary duty, breach of co-fiduciary duty and failure to monitor. Each also seeks to have the defendants make good on the alleged losses, disgorgement of profits, other relief and attorneys’ fees. The plaintiffs are also asking to have the plan menus reformed “to include only prudent investments.”

Northern Trust declined to comment on the litigation. Allstate did not respond to a request for comment.

Related Topics: , ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Retirees spend twice as much when they have guaranteed income, research finds

Most people don't plan bequests and many unnecessarily cut back on discretionary spending in retirement, according to a paper from an industry group.

Supreme Court muddies regulatory authority of SEC and DOL

Federal agencies could be more easily defeated in court over their interpretations of laws passed by Congress.

How fast-growing advisors get clients to give referrals

Asking clients why they're satisfied helps advisors plant stories that lead to referrals, a report from Capital Group found.

A Republican makes a case for ESG and sustainable investing

Despite attacks on environmental, social, and governance data being used, one former Congressman said he is hopeful about climate investing.

Retirement worries span market performance and the election

Nearly 90 percent of people told Schroders they are worried about the presidential election, and savers are overweighted in cash, the company found.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print