Nobel laureate Robert J. Shiller takes financial advisers seriously. In fact, he believes they are so important to consumers that he has advocated that the government subsidize personal advice for those who can't afford it on their own.
Speaking during a virtual conference last week, Mr. Shiller reiterated his plea to make financial advice more available, not only to the rich but also — and especially — to the middle- and lower-income classes. To the noted economist, it's simple: “People make better decisions with financial advisers,” he said.
As he has in the past, Mr. Shiller said that a lack of good financial advice was partly responsible for the financial crisis, pointing to the large numbers of Americans who took on outrageous amounts of debt to buy homes in the years leading up to the crisis.
In earlier writings, Mr. Shiller maintained that most Americans end up relying on salesmen of one sort or another to help them make key financial decisions. Real estate agents, mortgage brokers and car salesmen all can provide valuable information to consumers. But their advice is almost always compromised by their vested interest in seeing that a deal gets done — one way or another.
Mr. Shiller believes that the need for financial advice is so great that he is asking the government to subsidize it. In proposals going back to at least 2009, he has talked about providing four hours a year of advice at $75 an hour. If 50 million Americans were to take advantage of the subsidized service, it would cost the government $15 billion a year.
We are not supporting Mr. Shiller's specific proposal — at least not yet. We have serious reservations about the cost, and much more study needs to be done. Perhaps the many online services springing up in the financial advice field could offer a less expensive alternative.
But the fact that someone with Mr. Shiller's credentials is recommending financial advice for the masses is heartening. Now if we could just figure out a way to do it economically.
