Subscribe

Republican opposition to Gensler not likely to slow the new SEC chairman

Gary-Gensler-SEC-chairman Gary Gensler

His slim Senate confirmation margin reflects GOP concerns about the aggressive approach Gensler has signaled on issues like expanding corporate disclosures related to environmental, social and governance factors.

Gary Gensler had little room to spare in Wednesday’s Senate vote that confirmed him as the new chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, but nearly unanimous Republican opposition probably won’t slow his agenda.

The Senate approved Gensler, 53-45, with three Republicans joining the chamber’s 50 Democrats in one of the closest votes for a Biden administration nominee. The slim margin reflects GOP concerns about the aggressive approach Gensler has signaled on issues like expanding corporate disclosures related to environmental, social and governance factors.

Gensler knows his way around Washington, having previously served as chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, where he pushed through major derivatives reform following the financial crisis. He’s not likely to be daunted by a lack of Republican love.

“He was very goal-oriented at the CFTC,” said Susan Schroeder, a partner at the law firm WilmerHale. “He perceived he was given a mandate and he was intent on fulfilling that mandate. I anticipate he’ll take the same approach at the SEC.”

John Taft, vice chairman of the financial firm Baird, anticipates the SEC under Gensler will be tougher on oversight and enforcement than previous commissions.

“He is going to focus on doing what he thinks is right,” Taft said. “He won’t have his eye on vote numbers.”

The close Senate tally could signal more congressional attention to the agency, said Michael Zona, vice president of the Bullpen Strategy Group and a former Republican aide on the Senate Finance Committee. Unlike many other Biden nominees, Gensler, a former Goldman Sachs executive, didn’t get much deference from Republicans.

“The tighter-than-normal vote margin shouldn’t have much effect on the SEC’s regulatory process, especially with unified Democratic control of government, but it does indicate tougher oversight from Congress is likely,” Zona wrote in an email.  “When a nominee doesn’t earn enough trust from a senator to get their vote, that’s usually a sign that the agency will be a target for tougher scrutiny down the road.”

One area where Gensler and Republicans are likely to clash is ESG regulation. During his confirmation hearing last month, Gensler indicated support for a broad range of ESG disclosures in areas such as climate risk, political spending and racial diversity.

“Based on his record and statements during the nomination process, I’m concerned he will cause the SEC to use its regulatory powers to advance a liberal social agenda focused on issues such as global warming, political spending disclosures, and racial inequality and diversity,” Sen. Patrick Toomey, R-Pa. and ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, said during the debate over Gensler’s nomination.

With Gensler on board, the SEC now has a 3-2 Democratic majority.

In the months prior to Gensler’s confirmation, Democratic SEC member Allison Herren Lee enhanced the agency’s ESG oversight by establishing an enforcement task force, among other moves. She drew pushback from the Republican members Hester Peirce and Elad Roisman.

But the agency hasn’t yet undertaken writing new ESG rules.

“The fact that the SEC is talking about enforcing existing standards instead of creating new standards is likely an indication that they’re thinking about both sides of the aisle,” said Schroeder, a former enforcement chief at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc.

Addressing ESG standards is likely to garner bipartisan support but expanding required corporate disclosures is likely to increase partisan tension, Taft said. “It depends on what aspect of the issue you’re talking about.”

Congressional GOP skepticism won’t have a direct impact on how the SEC develops ESG policy under Gensler, said Ken Joseph, managing director of Kroll, a regulatory compliance consulting firm.

Nonetheless, Gensler does have to keep politics in mind.

“Although the commission is an independent agency, one has to be sensitive to the concerns of the minority party when fulfilling the majority agenda,” Joseph said.

Regulators take a closer look at ESG

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print