ASPPA: Employers need a break from required contributions

ASPPA is asking the government to give employers a break from rules that require many companies to contribute 3% to their employees’ 401(k) plans.
FEB 20, 2009
By  Bloomberg
The American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries is asking the government to give employers a break from rules that require many companies to contribute 3% to their employees’ 401(k) plans. Officials at the Arlington, Va.-based ASPPA wrote a letter to the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service asking that employers who are required to make a 3% contribution to their employees’ plans so they can get safe-harbor provisions be allowed to suspend the contribution because of economic hardship. Under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, employers who contributed 3% annually to employees’ 401(k) plans didn’t have to meet “non-discrimination” or “top-heavy” rules meant to prevent plans from favoring its higher earners. In the past, the IRS had limited the maximum deferral by highly compensated employees to make sure that lower-paid employees received at least a minimum benefit in plans where most of the assets were owned by higher-paid key employees. If companies failed to pass certain tests, they were required to return money to highly compensated workers. Now, employers who contribute the 3% to workers don’t have to take these tests. But the problem, according to ASPPA officials, is that many companies are struggling to contribute 3% to their 401(k) plans. Under existing regulations, employers who can’t afford to contribute to their plans have no other recourse than to terminate the retirement plans. The ASPPA is asking the government to allow employers to suspend their contributions though they would still have to show that the firm isn’t favoring highly compensated workers. “It's pretty bad, and a lot of employers are really considering it. Times are tough,” said Brian Graff, the ASPPA’s executive director and chief executive. “You're talking about a lot of employers who are freezing payroll, and 3% is a lot of money,” he said.

Latest News

Trump not planning to fire Powell, market tension eases
Trump not planning to fire Powell, market tension eases

Futures indicate stocks will build on Tuesday's rally.

From stocks and economy to their own finances, consumers are getting gloomier
From stocks and economy to their own finances, consumers are getting gloomier

Cost of living still tops concerns about negative impacts on personal finances

Women share investing strengths, asset preferences in new study
Women share investing strengths, asset preferences in new study

Financial advisors remain vital allies even as DIY investing grows

Trump vows to 'be nice' to China, slash tariffs
Trump vows to 'be nice' to China, slash tariffs

A trade deal would mean significant cut in tariffs but 'it wont be zero'.

Fed's Kugler warns of worse-than-expected impact of tariffs
Fed's Kugler warns of worse-than-expected impact of tariffs

Inflation, economic risk is greater than previously thought.

SPONSORED Compliance in real time: Technology's expanding role in RIA oversight

RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.

SPONSORED Advisory firms confront crossroads amid historic wealth transfer

As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.