Eaton Vance settles 401(k) lawsuit for $3.45 million

Eaton Vance settles 401(k) lawsuit for $3.45 million
Class-action suit alleged the firm mismanaged its own retirement plan and profited at the expense of employees.
MAY 08, 2019

Eaton Vance will pay $3.45 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging it mismanaged its company 401(k) plan and profited at the expense of its employees by offering them in-house mutual funds. The settlement furthers a trend playing out among financial services companies, especially those like Eaton Vance that are focused on actively managed investment strategies, many of which have been sued for self-dealing in their retirement plans. This has played out against a backdrop of increased litigation targeting employers for imprudently managing their retirement plans. The plaintiff — Shannon Price, a former employee — claimed Eaton Vance breached its fiduciary duties by offering proprietary investments, failing to monitor investment options and remove poorly performing ones, and offering insufficient fund selection. Eaton Vance's funds were the only actively managed options available in the 401(k) plan. Eaton Vance's settlement, reached Monday in Massachusetts district court, still needs court approval. The settlement covers roughly 2,600 participants in the Eaton Vance 401(k) Profit Sharing and Savings Plan between October 2012 and the date of the settlement's final approval. Robyn Tice, spokeswoman for Eaton Vance, declined comment. The $3.45 million settlement in the case, Price v. Eaton Vance Corp., is on the lower end of those in other similar lawsuits: Branch Banking & Trust Co. ($24 million), Deutsche Bank ($21.9 million), Franklin Templeton Investments ($14 million), Allianz ($12 million), Citigroup Inc. ($6.9 million), TIAA ($5 million), Waddell & Reed Financial Inc. ($5 million), Jackson National Life Insurance Co. ($4.5 million) and New York Life Insurance Co. ($3 million). Other lawsuits, such as one filed against American Century Investments, have been dismissed. Following a trial in Missouri district court, the judge in the American Century case, Greg Kays, said it "isn't disloyal as a matter of law" to offer only in-house funds to participants. "In fact, it is common for financial service companies to offer their own investment funds in their retirement plans," he said. "And there is no duty to offer more than one investment company's funds."

Latest News

Goldman gets shareholder backing on $80M executive bonus packages
Goldman gets shareholder backing on $80M executive bonus packages

The approval of the pay proposal, which handsomely compensates its CEO and president, bolsters claims that big payouts are a must in the war to retain leadership.

Integrated Partners, Kestra welcome multigenerational advisor teams
Integrated Partners, Kestra welcome multigenerational advisor teams

Integrated Partners is adding a husband-wife tandem to its network in Missouri as Kestra onboards a father-son advisor duo from UBS.

Trump not planning to fire Powell, market tension eases
Trump not planning to fire Powell, market tension eases

Futures indicate stocks will build on Tuesday's rally.

From stocks and economy to their own finances, consumers are getting gloomier
From stocks and economy to their own finances, consumers are getting gloomier

Cost of living still tops concerns about negative impacts on personal finances

Women share investing strengths, asset preferences in new study
Women share investing strengths, asset preferences in new study

Financial advisors remain vital allies even as DIY investing grows

SPONSORED Compliance in real time: Technology's expanding role in RIA oversight

RIAs face rising regulatory pressure in 2025. Forward-looking firms are responding with embedded technology, not more paperwork.

SPONSORED Advisory firms confront crossroads amid historic wealth transfer

As inheritances are set to reshape client portfolios and next-gen heirs demand digital-first experiences, firms are retooling their wealth tech stacks and succession models in real time.