Subscribe

Lessons Big Firms Can Learn from Small Firms

Many if not Most Advisors of acquired firms leave "Big" and return to "Small." Why?

Legacy Advest and Legg Mason Advisors, once they experienced the onus of Merrill Lynch and Smith Barney respectively, have fled in droves to firms like Raymond James, Janney Montgomery Scott, Stifel, and Robert W. Baird. These are Advisors who became frustrated with Big and chose Small. I spoke with many of them to understand why. Senior Executives at the Big Firms should pay attention:
1. Platform and technology advantages are not as important as the ability to get problems cleared up.
“Platform” is an all encompassing word meant to describe the offerings to Advisors and their clients. It includes all the tools and products that Advisors use to manage their business and their clients’ holdings on a daily basis. However, if the Advisor cannot get a person on the phone to take ownership of a problem, like a missing dividend, or to figure out why a check did not go out to a client, then the platform advantages do not matter. One Advisor put it this way: “I can’t tell my client about the great Alternative Investment idea when I can’t tell him why the check I promised him would go out two weeks ago has not arrived yet.”
2. Personnel changes matter to the field.
Advisors like to know that people at their firm, who do not produce, have a stake in their success. Of course, a Branch Manager should care about the success of the Advisors who report to him or her. Big Firm Advisor: “I always felt that my manager was looking for another job. How can I truly believe that my manager is interested in my long-term success when I know he is always interviewing for other positions?” In addition, the best Advisors form wonderful, symbiotic partnerships with the product liaisons who are crucial to their practice. When those people are laid off, another crucial tie to the “mother ship” is severed.
3. Make as many decisions as possible as close to the local branch as possible.
Advisors who have experienced both Big and Small tell me that the Branch Managers and their bosses at the Small Firm are able to take responsibility and make decisions faster than their Big Firm competitors. “At my old firm, everybody was scared to take responsibility for some of the most basic day to day decisions. They would pass the buck, discuss and e-mail to death and hope that the problem goes away. It was everyone’s fault and nobody’s fault because nobody knew who had the true authority to make a decision.” Lesson to Big Firms: If you have taken the time to hire skilled business people, empower them to make decisions. Your best assets leave the office every day; what are you doing every day to make them want to return?

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Is recruiting happening in the COVID world?

For wealth managers and advisers, recruiting is a contact sport. But 'contact' is now a four-letter word

As wealth management firms try to hold onto assets, they don’t always get what they pay for

Firms pay retiring brokers for their clients' assets, but clients often take their business elsewhere.

Independence means different things to different people in wealth management

Some define it as starting their own firm, while others insist it means having full control over investment products and client relationships

Wirehouses are losing the war for client assets

Firms like Schwab are raking in assets at a much faster clip than the big brokerages.

Regional firms provide an alternative to wirehouses

As big brokerages lose their competitive edge, regionals are offering a home to advisers who want to stay in the employee channel.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print