Subscribe

Most conservative investors? The young and the affluent

With two of the most severe bear markets of this century fresh in their short-term memories, affluent investors — particularly the youngest investors — appear to be quite skittish about investing in anything but the safest of asset classes.

With two of the most severe bear markets of this century fresh in their short-term memories, affluent investors — particularly the youngest investors — appear to be quite skittish about investing in anything but the safest of asset classes.

Merrill Lynch Global Wealth’s most recent quarterly survey of affluent investors (those with more than $250,000 in assets), found that 47% of the 1000 people it surveyed consider themselves to be conservative investors. And the most conservative segment of the group were the youngest (18-34 years old) — 59% of whom described themselves as conservative.

“It’s no mystery why this group would be very hesitant coming into the market,” said Lyle Lamothe, head of U.S. Wealth Management at Merrill Lynch Global Wealth Management in a teleconference call. “But we view it as a temporary phenomenon.”

If it isn’t, many affluent investors, whether young or old, may not have the kind of retirement they planned on.

Many investors, according to the Merrill survey, don’t understand the long-term consequences of adopting a conservative asset allocation strategy. Of the self-described conservative investors surveyed by Merrill Lynch, 66% of them said “conservatism” would actually help them avoid losing money in turbulent markets.

Just 25% felt that such an investing approach would keep them from seeing high rewards during stronger markets. And only 10% felt that conservatism would keep them from saving enough for retirement.

There are conflicting ideas and expectations amongst affluent retail investors, and advisers would do well to bone up on some behavioral finance principles in dealing with this hair-pulling, hand-wringing bunch.

“Emotion and intellect are involved here, and we have to use both to address client needs,” said Bill Moran, a Merrill Lynch wealth management adviser based in Washington D.C.

A more conservative investing strategy may not effectively address the legitimate worries about greater health care costs and longer life-spans.

The solution to this problem, according to the Merrill, is education. “There’s more risk, but there’s also more reward if you’re allocating in a sensible way,” said Mr. Lamothe. “Our industry’s job is to make sure we’re working on education and are ready to assist these investors.”

Related Topics:

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Athletes finish out of the money

From NFL star Terrell Owens to boxing legend Mike Tyson, too many professional athletes have gone from sudden wealth to financial ruin in a flash. What can advisers do to help protect sports stars and their assets?

Berkowitz bets on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

Betting on Congress to do anything is about as risky a bet as you can make, but Bruce Berkowitz is willing to make it.

Brokers, advisers facing uphill battle in finding new recruits

Attrition, retirement combine to keep reducing the number of active advisers. Is there fresh blood set to be injected into the workforce, or will this reduction continue?

ARCP throws in the towel on Cole III bid

American Realty Capital Properties on Thursday announced it is abandoning its high-profile — and contentious — bid for Cole III.

Genworth sale short list would be long list

A number of firms would likely be interested in buying Genworth's wealth management business — if it's on the block, that is.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print