Subscribe

Will newly proposed tax changes whack the wealthy?

With the Bush tax cuts extended for another two years, the status remains quo on major — and imminent — potential changes in tax law, right?

With the Bush tax cuts extended for another two years, the status remains quo on major — and imminent — potential changes in tax law, right?

Wrong. The budget released by the Obama administration this week has a number of tax proposals that could hit wealthy Americans and investors hard at the beginning of next year, according to Robert Gordon, president of Twenty-First Securities Corp.

The most significant of these changes is another proposal by the administration to limit the benefits that wealthy taxpayers can get from itemizing tax deductions. The biggest such deductions include mortgage interest payments and charitable contributions.

Under the proposal, single taxpayers making more than $171,850 and married people making more than $209,250 would be allowed to reduce their tax liability from deductions only at a rate of 28%. That’s the same rate at which a single taxpayer making between $82,400 and $171,850 can claim.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that such a change would bring in about $300 billion over the next 10 years.

The president has argued for the proposal in his previous two budgets. After all, Mr. Obama himself has asked why rich people — including the president — get to write off more of a charitable contribution or an interest payment than a middle-class family. “I don’t think that’s fair,” Mr. Obama said in early 2009 when he introduced his first budget proposal.

Mr. Gordon, however, points out that the government effectively would be saddling higher-income taxpayers with a new tax. “The administration is saying that a dollar coming in the door is taxable at one rate and a dollar going out is deductible at a lower rate. It’s technically not a tax increase, but it amounts to that.”

For example, a dollar of legitimately deductible expense no longer would offset a dollar of income earned for wealthier taxpayers. Instead, those in the 35% tax bracket would lose 7 cents on the dollar after tax — a $1 deduction would cost them 72 cents rather than 65 cents.

The proposal could make things a lot tougher for investors using margin accounts, as well. If an investor earned $100,000 in interest and/or short-term capital gains and spent $100,000 in deductible interest to earn it, he or she would be on the hook for $7,000 in taxes.
“They would have to earn more on their portfolios to break even,” Mr. Gordon said.

In the last two budgets, charitable groups were particularly critical of the proposal, fearing that wealthy taxpayers would cut back on their giving. This time around, however, the $300 billion in extra revenue may look a lot more attractive to Congress given the increasingly dire deficit situation.

“I’m not sure people realize this would kick in next January,” Mr. Gordon said.

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Athletes finish out of the money

From NFL star Terrell Owens to boxing legend Mike Tyson, too many professional athletes have gone from sudden wealth to financial ruin in a flash. What can advisers do to help protect sports stars and their assets?

Berkowitz bets on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac

Betting on Congress to do anything is about as risky a bet as you can make, but Bruce Berkowitz is willing to make it.

Brokers, advisers facing uphill battle in finding new recruits

Attrition, retirement combine to keep reducing the number of active advisers. Is there fresh blood set to be injected into the workforce, or will this reduction continue?

ARCP throws in the towel on Cole III bid

American Realty Capital Properties on Thursday announced it is abandoning its high-profile — and contentious — bid for Cole III.

Genworth sale short list would be long list

A number of firms would likely be interested in buying Genworth's wealth management business — if it's on the block, that is.

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print