Subscribe

SEC member Gallagher calls for review of SROs

Daniel Gallagher

A member of the Securities and Exchange Commission today called for a review of self-regulation of financial companies…

A member of the Securities and Exchange Commission today called for a review of self-regulation of financial companies but said he is keeping an open mind about shifting oversight of investment advisers from the SEC to an industry group.
In a speech in New York, SEC member Daniel Gallagher said that SROs such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. that regulate brokers have been “operating within a framework that we have not analyzed in depth for almost 20 years and no longer accurately reflects the state of today’s markets.”
Finra’s role in particular should be reassessed, according to Mr. Gallagher.
In a follow-up interview, however, he added that his speech was meant as a catalyst for a discussion about SROs rather than a critique of Finra.
A bill was introduced in the House this year that would authorize one or more adviser SROs. Finra is the strongest proponent of the measure and is seeking to become the adviser regulator.
That legislation is effectively dead for the year.
Mr. Gallagher suggested that Finra has its hands full regulating brokers.
“With all of the issues facing the broker-dealer industry it was created to oversee, should Finra be seeking to branch out into entirely new fields of responsibility, such as regulating investment advisers?” he said, according to the prepared text of his speech at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association’s Market Structure Conference. “Is ‘mission creep’ affecting Finra’s ability to perform its core duties?”
In the interview, Mr. Gallagher said he has not formulated a view about whether advisers should be regulated by an SRO.
“My mind is totally open on these issues,” said Mr. Gallagher, a Republican commissioner. “If there is going to be an SRO regime for advisers, I don’t want to be seen as saying Finra shouldn’t be doing it.”
The SRO bill was written by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Spencer Bachus, R-Ala. He wasn’t able to bring the legislation to a committee vote, in part because of resistance from fellow his GOP colleagues.
Finra declined to comment.

Related Topics: ,

Learn more about reprints and licensing for this article.

Recent Articles by Author

Wealth firms must prepare for demise of non-competes, despite legal challenges to FTC rule

A growing sentiment against restricting employee moves could affect non-solicitation, too.

FPA, CFP Board diverge on DOL investment advice proposal

While the CFP Board supports the proposal, the FPA has expressed concerns about the DOL rule potentially raising compliance costs for members, increasing the cost of advice and reducing access to advice for some.

Braxton encourages RIAs to see investing in diversity as a business strategy

‘If a firm values its human capital, then it will make an investment to make sure that their talent can flourish for the advancement of the bottom line,’ says Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners.

Bill chips away at SALT block but comes with drawbacks, advisors say

'I’d love to see the [full] SALT deduction come back but not if it means rates go up,' one advisor says.

Former Morgan Stanley broker running for office reviewing $147K award

Deborah Adeimy claimed firm blocked her from running in GOP primary, aide says 'we're unclear how award figure was calculated.'

X

Subscribe and Save 60%

Premium Access
Print + Digital

Learn more
Subscribe to Print